It has been said that prophecy is generally conversational in nature. A conversation between God and his children. You and I will often have to pay close attention or we may not notice when the conversation suddenly goes in new directions.

In “Prophecy Principles” Psalm 22 was used to
Illustrate these points.

For instance, look at the death of Jesus as prophesied in Psa 22:14-18. You can read what actually happened about a thousand years later in the Gospels, and see that Psalm 22 was very accurate, but it still was not a rigidly chronological discussion. Nor are few prophecies.

Some speak of this trait as being almost
intolerable.

Some say this is something weird and strange and unknown about Scripture and prophecy. Actually much writing and much history is not always sequential.

Take Will Durant’s “The Age of Reason Begins.”

This is Durant’s history of these things from 1558-1648, a mere 90 years. Is it rigidly sequential? It is divided in to three books:

Book I, The English Ecstasy: 1558-1648

Book II, Faith Fights for Power: 1556-1648

Book III, The Tentatives of Reason: 1558-1648

Similarly, even within these “Books” it is not rigidly sequential, nor can it be. In fact in this case it is a series of parallel accounts. This is common especially in books of history. However, Scripture is sometimes unjustly criticized for not being sequential.

Psalm 22 for instance is generally sequential,
but not rigidly so.

The subject, Jesus death, is announced in the first verse,

“My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”
Psa 22:1 WEB

Such announcing of the subject at first, is also common in historical accounts. Finally the Psalm ends with all men having to bow before Jesus.

“… All those who go down to the dust shall bow before him,
Even he who can’t keep his soul alive.”
Psa 22:29

So it is generally sequential, much as with a good history, but not rigidly so.

Similarly, Matthew chapter 24 is generally sequential,
but not rigidly so.

Matthew 24 clearly talks about the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD (some 40 years into the future), and also talks about the end of this world (very clearly in Mtt 24:36 and the verses following). Evidently, the destruction of Jerusalem is symbolic of the end of this world. However, look at verse 6. It is in the early section about the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD.

“You will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you aren’t troubled, for all this must happen, but the end is not yet.”
Mtt 24:6 WEB

Many quote this of the end of this world, and they are right. Wars and rumors of wars are not a sign of the end of the world! However, “wars and rumors of war,” ARE A SIGN OF THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM IN 70 AD! You see Jerusalem was destroyed in a Roman invasion of Judea to suppress the Jewish revolt!

So at the start of the discussion of 70 AD is a verse about the end of the world. Generally sequential, but not rigidly so.

WEB is the World English Bible, a copyright free revision
of the original ASV American Standard Version 1901